Is it risky to play 3 at the back

0
  1. 3 @ the back6 votes
    1. Yeah
      33.33%
    2. No
      66.67%

Comments

  • 0
    ihatetayihatetay Posts: 296

    That formation yes. If you play 3 at the back with wingers you need CDM rather than CM. Because CM's position too high in FIFA. CDM sit just above the CB's. I would suggest the 3-5-2 with cdm's and cam.

    But other than that it is not risky to play 3 at the back as long as you find a good balance in your team. It is boring to see people playing the same formations again and again.
    So yes try 3 at the back it is fun!

  • 0
    Yeah I play 3-5-2 in game with salah and Anderson up to with kdb in the cam
  • 0
    JBABY181JBABY181 Posts: 78

    I think it can be high risk/high reward. You're sacrificing a defender for a midfielder or forward. So you might give up a few more goals, but you can score more goals and outscore your opponent in the end.

  • 0

    I played 5-2-1-2 and switched to 3-5-2 in game. You might have a very defensive CM to run back and help not opening a gap between midfield and backline. You need fast CBs also to cover the RWB/LWB runs to the attack.

  • 0
    Back 3 hierro 91 Ramos 92 vvd 90
    Cdm casamero pink and Modric 92
    Lm otw mahrez rm ucl sane
Sign In or Register to comment.